While reading this article I was struck by the "fictions" that Dance presented about urban teens. The way "hardcore" teens are presented in the media is as if they have no remorse for their actions. This simply is not the case at all. Dance (2002) makes it clear that real-life hardcore adolescents not only feel regret and guilt, but they're also scared. To be fair, they did not choose where they grew up and they cannot control what is going on around them. The violence shown by hardcore teens in the media appears to be commit by soulless monsters. It is true that the hardcore teens may participate in acts in violence, but there are reason for it. I'm not saying there are good reasons, and I'm not saying that anyone has an excuse for committing a crime, but it is important to look at the situation from every angle. A child who grows up around violence is more likely to be violent themselves. Also, it is really troubling and unfortunate when a teenager who is "hard-enough" commits acts of violence not because they want to, but because they have to. What these children need is a safe environment, role-models, and the opportunity to go about their day without having to worrying about if they're perceived as "hard" just to get by.
Reference
Dance, L.J. (2002). On being "hardcore," "a hardcore wannabe," or "hard enough." In Tough Fronts: The impact of street culture on schooling. New York: RoutledgeFalmer, 51 - 70.
No comments:
Post a Comment